Best.is a comparative statement. Rather I think, we expect things to be just normal, which inturns is the best, cause just normal things are hard to find. Most of the things we see around are either substandard or extravagent. Well, that was about creation and being. Ofcourse, I would not dare to say that, roark is normal, but I wouldn't disagree with it either. We say that, he's the best, but is he really? or everybody else is substandard?? Lacking somewhere in logic, thoughts, considerations,conscience, knoledge about basic facts of life..everything determines , if we can live a normal life. To be like him, wouldn't be a goal as objectivism inculcation cannot be a goal, it is a journey in which you need to be constantly at the destination.

Godel's theorm: Nothing can be proven outside one's concious belief as without it it has no meaning. Proof and its methods is for one's own mind and its end/aim is also mind only.

am I insane, or m I substandard outcome of the human creed. Or is substandard a clause which itself justifies the supriority. It really makes me fumble with the normal life which I lead right now, or abnormal life which i can call it to make more sense. Is it really you who can give me a fair reflection? Or do i really need a reflection. Life has not been too keen on giving non humanly shapes to thinking machines. I am realy writing this for my self or for the shear fact that, you might read this one day. May be or may be not...can't findout myself. So tell me and reflect so that I can reflect even brighter to voide the intuitive argument and get in to a logical one, which would last forever.